The 2026 edition of “ZeroedIn: The Brand Marketing Pulse” is now live.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has published the 2026 Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for company reporting.
If you report under SECR, set targets, or track a corporate footprint, these are the numbers that turn your activity data into emissions, so a change in the factors changes your results even when your operations do not.
This year the story is unusually concentrated. Almost every material change traces back to one source: electricity. Direct fuel combustion barely moved. That makes the 2026 update easy to summarise but easy to misread, because a large part of the headline reduction is a change in method and timing rather than a change in the real world.
Here is what moved, why, and what it means for the numbers you report.
The UK grid average electricity factor falls by about 26% compared with the 2025 set (with methane down 26% and nitrous oxide down 30%). On its own that looks like a strong decarbonisation signal. The detail is more nuanced.
DESNZ has changed the methodology so that the data used now lags the publication year by one year instead of two. The consequence is important: this single update absorbs two years of grid change rather than the usual one. DESNZ breaks the fall down as follows:
In plain terms: a business with identical electricity consumption this year and last will see its Scope 2 location-based emissions drop sharply, and most of that drop is timing and method, not something the business did.
Because so many factors are built on top of the grid figure, the 26% fall ripples through the dataset.
A handful of other changes this year are driven by new activity data, and some are large enough to notice in a footprint:
The single most important point for 2026 is that year-on-year comparability is broken this cycle. Because the update folds two years of grid change together with methodology corrections, the electricity-driven fall in your footprint is not a like-for-like reduction.
A defensible approach does three things:
Used carefully, the 2026 factors are good news: the grid is genuinely cleaner. Used carelessly, they invite an overstated reduction claim that can create hiccups in your downward emissions trajectory, and probably won’t survive scrutiny. The difference is in how clearly you explain the change.
Need help working out what the 2026 factors do to your specific footprint, or how to present the change without overstating your reductions, and disrupting the flow of future reductions too?
That is exactly the kind of question our Climate Success Managers handle. Get in touch at info@51tocarbonzero.com or 020 4578 4040.